“It is Armenia, not Pashinyan, who surrendered”

“Who is in the place of Pashkina – Robert Kocharyan, Serzh Sargsyan, let’s just say that, Regardless of the presence of Ishkhan Sagatelyan, any person would have to obediently make a decision to be made in Armenia.

RFE / RL’s Armenian Service reports according to This was stated by the first president of Armenia in his article published on ilur.am. Levon Ter-Petrosyan wrote.

According to Ter-Petrosyan, “the current interior political snowsneezing ”of Armenia snowweakens its position in difficult negotiations:

“Refusal to compromise and status quo maintenance policy national there is no need to prove that it led to disaster. Even some former supporters of that policy admit it after the disaster. ”

“Court of history”

Levon Ter-Petrosyan’s article goes on to say:

“But at the same time, many are trying to prove themselves that, even if they had chosen the path of compromise, the result would have been the same. This is nothing more than a helpless attempt to justify oneself, because history does not like the conditional form of the verb. ”

The first president of Armenia writes that, history records only what happened:

“It simply came to our notice then according to also a compromise on the Karabakh conflict way Opponents of the solution (statesmen, intellectuals), no matter how much they try to justify their anti-national actions, sooner or later, the court of history snow“No one has escaped yet.”

“Even if everyone was in Pasha’s place”

Levon Ter-Petrosyan writes that, Today’s actions of opponents of compromise are also Armenia and It deepens the crisis in Karabakh.

The past president reports that, It is unknown at this time what he will do after leaving the post.

The label “surrender” to Pashkina on the initiative of Serzh Sargsyan yaplit. While this may be true, it is incomplete. In fact, not Pashinyan, but Armenia surrendered. Pashinyan simply signed a statement on the capitulation of Armenia. For this reason, who is in the place of Pashkina – Robert Kocharyan, Serzh Sargsyan, let’s just say that, Regardless of the presence of Ishkhan Sagatelyan, any person would have to obey the decision to be made in Armenia.

Levon Ter-Petrosyan writes that, The problem does not depend on who is the leader in Armenia:

“If this simple truth is not understood, our country is in turmoil political If the shaking continues, the decisions that will be required of us will be repeatedly painful, regardless of whether Pashinyan or someone else signs the final document. “

“Desperately optimistic…”

According to the former president, if the current leaders of the opposition do not understand this, then they have no understanding of politics:

“It simply came to our notice then political if they continue to shake, then they are national they pursue other interests that have nothing to do with it. ”

At the same time, according to Ter-Petrosyan, the current government has reacted harshly to the protests organized by the opposition national does not serve the interests of:

“I am just happy to be here that, the opposing parties will finally realize the danger of their position, not to complicate the situation further and “They will reach an agreement to avoid new threats.”

Levon Ter-Petrosyan writes that, “If the representatives of the intelligentsia want to do something patriotic, let Nicole Pashkina, Robert Kocharian and Serzh Sargsyan come to the same table and talk about the internal political crisis. way to force them to find it. “