ASC will discuss the implementation of court decisions

In the list Azerbaijan there is also

On December 6 Europe It will be the 1451st meeting of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Ministers.

At the meeting Europe Decisions of the Court of Human Rights (ECHR). execution discuss the situation will be done.

These decisions Albania, Armenia, AzerbaijanBulgaria, Cyprus, FranceGeorgia, GreeceHungary, Italy, Lithuania, Malta, Moldova, Macedonia, Poland, Romania, Russia Federation, Serbia, Turkey, Ukraine and related to the United Kingdom.

Decisions discussed by the Committee of Ministers at the end of the meeting, which will continue until December 8 execution will announce its resolutions regarding the situation.

About Azerbaijan at the meeting Khadija Ismayilova, Pomegranate Mammadli, Elchin Namazov’s group and “Sargsyan To Azerbaijan against” case decisions execution situation will be discussed.

“Khadija Ismayilova group” in the case, the execution of 2 decisions of the ECHR on the journalist’s complaints is monitored.

Those decisions are related to the violation of the applicant’s rights to personal integrity and freedom of expression (distribution of personal images) related to his activity as a journalist.

As part of this group work Azerbaijan the government should create an effective mechanism for the protection of journalists, investigate crimes committed against journalists, regarding the right to expression and respect for private life court should ensure the development of experience.

Before the discussions, the government of Azerbaijan to the JSC NK Khadija Against Ismayilova crime He said that the investigation of his actions has been renewed.

Earlier, the prosecutor’s office made a decision to stop the investigation.

“Pomegranate The Mammadli group monitors the implementation of 6 decisions of the ECHR regarding Azerbaijan.

Pomegranate Mammadli, Intigam Aliyev, Azizov and Novruzlu, Ibrahimov and Mammadov, Khadija Ismayilova (2), Arif and those decisions issued on the complaints of Leyla Yunus are active of the applicants political and social up to trial in violation of Article 18 of the Convention for their participation, criticism of the government, human rights and election monitoring activities imprisonment related to their detention and deprivation of liberty.

The “aihmaz.org” site, which specializes in publishing materials related to the ECtHR’s decisions and investigations, writes that the implementation of these decisions is problematic.

The individual and general measures required to eliminate the problems raised by the decisions remain unimplemented.

The site writes that the government of Azerbaijan presented to the meeting “Azizov and Novruzlu To Azerbaijan against” said that the decision was executed.

The presentation states that Ali The Plenum of the Court re-examined the case on newly opened cases and against both applicants crime made a decision to terminate the proceedings in the case.

The government asked the JSC NK to close the control over the implementation of the decision.

In their submissions, the lawyers of the applicants stated that all the measures for the decision to be considered fully implemented have not been implemented.

Lawyers Nemat Karimli and Fariz Namazli asked the Committee of Ministers to ask the government to delete all data related to the convictions of the applicants and Ilgar Mammadov and for moral damages to each of the applicants, as in the case of Rasul Jafarov compensation demand payment.

Within the framework of the “Namazov group” 3 decisions of the ECtHR regarding Azerbaijan (Elchin Namazov, Khalid Bagirov, Aslan Ismayilov “To Azerbaijan against” decisions) are monitored.

All 3 decisions of lawyers in Azerbaijan Lawyers It is related to their expulsion from the college.

ECHR from disqualification from the legal profession in these cases complaint decided in favor of the applicants.

Azerbaijan government to each of the applicants in the presentation of this group work compensation noted that the amount has been paid.

It was also stated that Collegium of Advocates a legislative proposal has been prepared on establishing special grounds for expulsion from membership in the internal legislation.

It is reported that the proposal related to the Law “On Lawyers and Legal Activities” has been sent to the relevant state bodies for approval.

The government believes that the approval of this project will be an adequate tool to protect lawyers.

The decision “Sargsyan v. Azerbaijan” in 1992 is Nagorno Karabakh during the conflict mandatory It is related to the impossibility of access to the houses and properties of the displaced persons.

In parallel with this decision, the JSC NK should also discuss the implementation of the decision “Chiragov et al. v. Armenia”. These decisions have a similar content.

The government of Azerbaijan, in its presentation on the status of the implementation of the “Sargsyan v. Azerbaijan” decision, confirmed its intention to take measures for the execution of the order, and expressed its readiness to pay fair compensation to the applicant.

At the same time, it was stated that the payment of fair compensation should be implemented in relation to both decisions.

The applicants in the case “Chiragov and others v. Armenia” are from Lachin district mandatory displaced Elkhan and Adishirin Chiragovs, Ramiz and Garaja Jabrayilovs, Fakhreddin Pashayev and Akif Although more than 5 years have passed since the adoption of the decision in Hasanov AŞ’s submissions to NK, Armenia they stated that their government has not taken any steps regarding the implementation.

“Fair enough so far substitute not paid. As we continue to live in harsh living conditions and still cannot return to Lachin, our situation remains as it is.

The first measure we are still waiting for is the payment by the ECtHR of the fair compensation calculated for each of us for the damages, costs and expenses, together with interest, without delay,” the applicants said.

The applicants also noted that recently to the city of Lachin and the villages of Agbulag, Chirag and Chiragli trip they faced the reality that their house was completely destroyed:

“We have lost our homes and property irretrievably. Moreover, it seems very difficult for us to return to Lachin in the coming months and even years, due to the complete destruction of houses and infrastructure, heavy mine contamination,” – said the applicants, noting that they were accused of illegal destruction of houses and properties of Armenia. compensation they stated that they have to pay.

Official institutions related to the execution of ECtHR decisions, applicants, NGOcontrols based on the information provided by and other related parties.