Foreign Ministry of Azerbaijan comments on Zohrab Mnatsakanyan’s statement

The Press Service Department of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Azerbaijan has commented on the statement of the Foreign Minister of Armenia during the press briefing in Moscow.

Report informs, the Foreign Ministry’s statement reads:

The statement made by Zohrab Mnatsakanyan, Minister of Foreign Affairs of Armenia, during his official visit to the Russian Federation contains some traditionally incorrect points. These points are designed to misrepresent the Armenia-Azerbaijan Nagorno-Karabakh conflict situation and thus mislead the international community.

In this connection, the MFA of Azerbaijan is obliged to remind that Armenia’s present political-military leadership for the past two years has been taking steps intentionally and deliberately to escalate the situation around the conflict. These steps included provocative statements and other measures that seriously undermined the negotiation process and resulted in a deadlock. They also included numerous practical actions to consolidate the illegal results of Armenia’s aggression against Azerbaijan and continued military occupation of Azerbaijan’s internationally recognized territories. The most obvious examples include the “Karabakh is Armenia, period” statement, the “new war for new territories” military concept, a military provocation at the Tovuz direction of the Azerbaijan-Armenia border in July 2020, a campaign to settle the Lebanese Armenians in the occupied territories.

The attack launched against Azerbaijan by armed forces of Armenia on 27 September is another step in this destructive escalation policy. As a sovereign state, the Republic of Azerbaijan took relevant steps within its right to self-defense under Article 51 of the UN Charter. As a result, a number of Azerbaijani territories were liberated from Armenia’s occupation. Regretfully, Armenia resorted to the traditional terror tactics, launching massive shelling the peaceful population and civilian infrastructure of Azerbaijan, including those located at a great distance from the conflict zone. Since 27 September, 42 Azerbaijani civilians were killed and 206 wounded by fire opened by the armed forces of Armenia, as well as 1479 houses, 66 residential buildings, and 241 civil facilities destroyed.

Showing its goodwill, Azerbaijan reacted positively to the Russian Federation’s appeals, attended the Moscow meeting of 3 Ministers, and negotiated there in a constructive manner. Azerbaijan declared its commitment to the humanitarian ceasefire agreed upon at the conference and instructed its Armed Forces accordingly.

Armenia, however, chose a very different path. Its armed forces opened mortar fire at the Azerbaijani medical team collecting bodies of Armenian military personnel in the vicinity of Suqovushan, Tartar district of Azerbaijan. As a result, Azerbaijani medical personnel was wounded heavily. Furthermore, at 2 am on 11 September, Armenia’s armed forces launched a ballistic missile on Ganja, Azerbaijan’s second-largest city. The missile hit and destroyed a multi-floor residential building. Ten civilians were killed and many more injured, including children.

Armenia’s diplomatic actions in the aftermath of the Moscow meeting are also quite revealing. The Moscow meeting’s final statement reaffirmed the commitment to the existing negotiation format and envisaged the start of substantive talks upon the basic principles.

Azerbaijan declared its readiness to engage in the negotiations at the soonest. In its turn, Armenia immediately started issuing statements, which reflected a one-sided and inaccurate interpretation of the Moscow meeting statement, repeating slogans of self-determination and recognition of the illegal regime established by Armenia in the occupied territories of Azerbaijan.

Azerbaijan finds such an approach to be completely non-constructive, as it violates the letter and spirit of the norms and principles of international law, the UNSC resolutions, OSCE decisions, and provisions of the Moscow meeting statement.