Critical NATO statement from Sweden! They rocked… ‘The process did not pause’ |
Swedish Foreign Minister Tobias Billström of his country NATOmade statements to the Swedish press about the accession process. Finland, Sweden and the country Turkey Billström, who expressed that he tried to fulfill all the articles of the tripartite memorandum signed between Turkey and Sweden NATO he argued that it was almost time for him to confirm his membership. Billström, leader of Denmark’s far-right Hardline Party, Rasmus Paluda in Stockholm Turkey after Sweden’s provocative act of burning a Koran in front of its embassy NATOstated that the membership process has become difficult and put forward the reason for this.
On the other hand, Billström said that he expects the confirmation of Sweden’s NATO membership at the NATO Summit to be held in Vilnius, the capital of Lithuania, in July.
After Billström’s statements regarding the accession process of his country to Sweden, the news that “Sweden has frozen the NATO accession process” was spread in the press. Billström’s press secretary, Anna Erhardt, stated that Billström’s statements were misunderstood and announced that Sweden has not stopped the NATO membership process.
Erhardt denied the news that Sweden has stopped the NATO membership process, saying, “The NATO process has not stopped. Government Sweden, Finland and Turkey continues to apply the memorandum between But Turkey will decide when to ratify it,” he said.
After the provocative action of Rasmus Paluda, the leader of the extreme right-wing Danish far-right party, by burning the Koran in front of the Turkish embassy in Stockholm, Turkey decided to postpone the tripartite talks with Sweden and Finland.
Minister of Foreign Affairs Born Çavuşoğlu Emphasizing that Sweden should make a decision regarding the NATO membership process, he said, “These are mines in the membership process. In this environment, a tripartite meeting does not make sense. The purpose of this tripartite meeting is that we put before you a testament in which of them we see what Sweden and Finland do or do not do. As the current environment will overshadow it, it is postponed because it will not be a healthy meeting. Regardless, we see that Sweden has not taken any serious steps to implement this agreement. “I am changing the constitution, I am changing the anti-terrorism law, I have done my part” will not happen, it will not pass. A tripartite meeting will not help here either. Official on the separation of the accession processes of Sweden and Finland offer we didn’t get it. There are steps the two countries must take in the membership process. Relatively, the problems we face with Finland are less than with Sweden. But both NATO and these countries are in favor of joint membership process.
Translation“24 HOURS”