Palantir CEO Says Ukraine War Shows Relevance of Military Artificial Intelligence | – #Palantir #CEO #Ukraine #War #Shows #Relevance #Military #Artificial #Intelligence
AMSTERDAM, February 15 (Reuters) – of Ukraine Russia effective use of artificial intelligence (AI) technology to target forces from around the world military and political brought to the leaders’ agenda, USAsoftware firm Palantir ( PLTR.N ) CEO said. on Wednesday.
Responsible for intellectual intelligence military Speaking at the first international summit on the use of artificial intelligence, CEO Alex Karp said that the use of artificial intelligence in warfare has become a major concern since the start of the conflict in Ukraine.
“That’s changed now: your ability to identify the right technology and implement it will determine what happens on the battlefield,” he said.
“One of the main things we have to do in the West is to teach this lesson to China and Russia is to understand that it is completely understood by”.
Karp previously stated that Planatir was “responsible for most of the targets in Ukraine” and that the company was supplying samples of tanks and artillery. From satellites to visualize the positions of the army and social took news from the media and marketed software to quickly identify resources for deployment.
Latest Updates Business Category Lufthansa IT Crash Strands Thousands of Passengers video Article with VideoChargedcategoryNew Biden EV charger rules Made in America force Tesla to change, article with gallery
See 2 more stories
USA and China are among the 50 countries attending this week’s REAIM summit in The Hague, but the Netherlands and co-founder South Korea have not invited Russia.
While international rules or a treaty limiting the use of artificial intelligence in warfare appears remote, most delegations are expected to approve the statement of principles when the conference ends on Thursday.
Karp said one of the principles he supports for corporations like his is that they can explain and audit how their technology is being used.
He gave the example of an AI decision to strike enemy soldiers near a school or hospital.
“You need an architecture that allows transparency into the data sources, what data sources were used, what the (input) feeds were, and then separate it out.”
He said that “a mandate should be given by law. More importantly, it should be mandated by the purchase order.
By Toby Sterling report; Edited by Kirsten Donovan
Our standards: Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.
2023-02-15 23:16:36
Source – reuters
Translation“24 HOURS”