Tech-funded study criticizes plan to exclude non-EU cloud vendors | – #Techfunded #study #criticizes #plan #exclude #nonEU #cloud #vendors

BRUSSELS, March 6 (Reuters) – Amazon ( AMZN.O ), Alphabet’s ( GOOGL.O GoogleMicrosoft ( MSFT.O ) and other non-EU cloud service providers could be unblocked offer which is Europe The EU’s cloud security label is discriminatory and could result in retaliation, according to a study commissioned by a tech lobby group.

International, commissioned by the Computer and Communications Industry Association (CCIA). Political On economics Europe (ECIPE) Center report USAhighlights growing personal concern among tech giants about the label’s draft plan. he

At issue is a provision in EU cyber security agency ENISA’s certification scheme (EUCS) that requires cloud service providers to have a registered head office and global headquarters in the EU and to operate cloud services and store and process customer data in the 27-member bloc. .

“I think, political the intention is to crowd out foreign suppliers, but it will of course also be effective for EU businesses that rely more or less on cloud computing services,” ECIPE director Matthias Bauer told Reuters.

Latest UpdatesWorld CategoryTikTok prohibits some foreign technologies USA law is a potential target in the project – Senator, article with galleryGalleryBusinesscategoryTesla USA Model S and Model X price cuts between 4% and 9%, pictorial article

See 2 more stories

“Member states now have a cyber security agency and also Europe Commission political motivated EUCS should call for a waiver of immunity claims,” he said.

ENISA is awaiting feedback from EU countries and “will then finalize the scheme taking maximum account of this feedback and submit the final candidate scheme to the European Commission,” he said.

The EU executive declined to comment on the ECIPE report.

“The scheme must be fully compliant with EU law as well as with the EU’s international obligations, including trade,” said a Commission spokesperson.

ECIPE is the proposal’s cybersecurity label for new technologies such as internet-connected devices in the fields of energy, healthcare and autonomous driving. mandatory He said that it could create a dangerous precedent for any information-intensive sector.

The think tank said the ban could also lead to retaliation by the EU’s trading partners.

Report by Foo Yun Chee; Edited by Alexander Smith

Our standards: Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

2023-03-06 10:08:28
Source – reuters

Translation“24 HOURS”